
Morris-Cotterill: First thoughts on the FATF's revised processes

Four things jumped out at me:
1. I didn't see any of the much trumpeted reversal of the policy to stop picking on small and poor jurisdictions.
2. I failed to pick my way through the buzzwords and acronyms that defy all attempts to make sense of the document in any reasonable time.
3. The FATF officially disapproves of online meetings and says that meetings should be conducted in person. It makes no mention of the cost to the environment or to taxpayers of such a policy.
4. The FATF used to have a time-limit on its life then it decided to vote itself perpetual life unless it decided otherwise. There are comments in this that seem to imply it will last for ever.
About this section
Opinion pieces or "Op-Eds" are the home-made bombs of the publishing world. So long as they meet editorial standards, are not intentionally offensive with a view to causing hurt or insult and are relevant to our field of endeavour, we will look at submissions.
We like contentious, we like contrarian views. We don't like pretty much any -ism . We recognise that Opinion pieces are one person's view and are not balanced (if they are balanced and reach a reasoned conclusion, they are probably more suited to the Articles section). We do not like acronyms and buzzwords.
Op-Eds are the author's personal views and do not necessarily represent the views of World Money Laundering Report or its publishers.
To submit an Opinion piece, please complete the Contact form.

