
Jenkinson: The UK's decision to refuse to pay ransomware demand is flawed.

Announced alongside a forthcoming UK Home Office consultation, the initiative aims to stop payouts to cybercriminals making them illegal and enforcing mandatory reporting, enhancing the National Crime Agency (NCA) ability to track incidents, and blocking payments to sanctioned groups.
Ransomware attacks exploit vulnerabilities in poorly secured systems, (we have shared many examples with UK Home Office, National Crime Agency (NCA), UK Ministry of Defence as well as many other government offices).
Cyber criminals target exposed and insecure organizations holding sensitive data. Cyberattacks are not all Ransomware attacks, many are for espionage and far too many are successful.
Cybercriminals will continue to find ways other than Ransomware to monetize the data be it PII data or IP data, such as selling it on the dark web or data brokers.
Simply banning Ransomware payments does nothing to address the underlying issue and root cause for Ransomware attacks: suboptimal cybersecurity practices.
Without significant investment and robust defenses, systems remain exposed, leaving hackers emboldened and cyber crime rife.
Contact Andy Jenkinson here: https://www.linkedin.com/in/andy-jenkinson-96210727/
The government’s initiative could be seen as shifting the burden of accountability and responsibility for breaches onto victims rather than addressing systemic flaws. This “finger-in-the-dam” approach provides only temporary mitigation, while vulnerabilities persist, threatening to overwhelm the dam entirely.
Real progress requires prioritizing strong foundational security, accountability at all levels, and fostering resilience through education and stricter adherence to security protocols.
The proposed measures may heighten awareness and intelligence but will fail without proactive investment in securing public sector and infrastructure systems.
Cybercrime is a battle fought not just with penalties but by eliminating weak points ripe for exploitation.
About this section
Opinion pieces or "Op-Eds" are the home-made bombs of the publishing world. So long as they meet editorial standards, are not intentionally offensive with a view to causing hurt or insult and are relevant to our field of endeavour, we will look at submissions.
We like contentious, we like contrarian views. We don't like pretty much any -ism . We recognise that Opinion pieces are one person's view and are not balanced (if they are balanced and reach a reasoned conclusion, they are probably more suited to the Articles section). We do not like acronyms and buzzwords.
Op-Eds are the author's personal views and do not necessarily represent the views of World Money Laundering Report or its publishers.
To submit an Opinion piece, please complete the Contact form.


