
Kumar: The invisible puppeteers

That moment struck me. Here was a child, completely hooked, not just because the game was fun but because an algorithm had learnt his preferences and tailored the experience to keep him engaged. I couldn’t help but think - how often do we, as adults, fall into the same trap? How often does an program quietly nudge us toward a purchase, a binge-worthy series or even a political opinion?
This incident made me reflect deeply on how digital platforms and "AI" are reshaping not just our choices but our behaviours and interactions. It inspired me to write this piece, exploring the profound influence of technology on human behaviour, its implications, and what we can do to regain control.
The Transformation of Social Interactions
Digital platforms have redefined relationships. Remember when birthdays were remembered through phone calls or cards? Now, a quick post or emoji does the job. Platforms like Facebook, Instagram and WhatsApp have made communication instantaneous; but at what cost?
Imagine a world where your every click, swipe, and like is meticulously analysed, shaping not just your preferences but your very decisions. This is not the future—it’s our reality. Technology, particularly digital platforms and "artificial intelligence" ("AI"), has revolutionised how we interact, connect, and make decisions. Yet, as much as it empowers, it also manipulates. The question is: how do we regain control?
Online interactions often replace meaningful, face-to-face conversations, eroding empathy and deep connections. The curated nature of social media feeds also fuels comparison and competition, affecting mental health. For instance, studies show that frequent social media users are more likely to experience anxiety or depression due to unrealistic portrayals of life.
"AI" takes this one step further. Algorithms predict our interests, serve targeted content and subtly shape our views. Polarisation in political opinions, for example, is amplified by echo chambers created by algorithms that prioritise engagement over balance.
Dr Kumar is at https://www.linkedin.com/in/dr-aneish-kumar-422426b6/
The Effect on Decision-Making
"AI" doesn’t just influence our choices; it often makes them for us. Think of Netflix recommending your next binge or Amazon and Flipkart suggesting what to buy. While convenient, this narrows our exposure to diverse perspectives and limits serendipity—the joy of discovering something new by chance.
Moreover, decision fatigue is real. With countless options available online, "AI" steps in to “help,” but it often nudges us toward choices that align with the platform’s profitability, not our best interests. Consider how online ads lead you to impulse purchases or how YouTube’s autoplay keeps you hooked longer than intended.
Behavioural Manipulation: The Dark Side
Digital platforms are designed to maximise user engagement. Techniques like infinite scrolling, push notifications and gamification are not just features; they’re traps. These tools exploit cognitive biases, such as the fear of missing out (FOMO), and our tendency to seek instant gratification.
Take the case of TikTok’s algorithm, which hooks users with personalised, endless content. While entertaining, it often results in hours of unproductive scrolling, reinforcing addictive behaviour.
"AI" further exacerbates this by creating hyper-personalised experiences. While personalisation sounds positive, it often confines users within a filter bubble, limiting exposure to diverse content and viewpoints.
Altering the Narrative: What We Should Do
The first step to regaining control is awareness. Understanding how these platforms and technologies manipulate behaviour is crucial. Education campaigns, particularly for young users, can shed light on the psychological effects of technology use.
Next, we need to advocate for ethical design. Developers and tech companies should prioritise user well-being over profit. For instance, apps can incorporate features like activity timers, content diversity algorithms or even mandatory breaks to encourage healthier usage patterns.
Legislation also plays a vital role. Governments must enforce regulations that promote transparency in "AI" algorithms and hold companies accountable for unethical practices. For example, the European Union’s "AI" Act aims to set clear boundaries on high-risk "AI" applications.
On a personal level, cultivating digital literacy is essential. Simple practices like turning off unnecessary notifications, setting screen time limits and consciously diversifying your online content can go a long way. Additionally, fostering offline connections and hobbies can help counterbalance the digital pull.
A Glimpse into the Future
The future of technology doesn’t have to be dystopian. Imagine "AI" tools that foster meaningful interactions, such as apps that recommend nearby community events instead of isolating you online. Or consider platforms that prioritise transparency, allowing users to see how algorithms shape their feeds and giving them the power to adjust these settings.
The potential for "AI" and digital platforms to enhance human life is immense. But realising this potential requires a collective effort—from developers, regulators, and users—to ensure that technology serves humanity, not the other way around.
Conclusion
Technology is neither good nor bad; it’s a tool. How it affects human behaviour depends on how we choose to design, regulate, and use it. By being more mindful of its influence and advocating for ethical practices, we can steer the digital age toward empowerment rather than manipulation.
After all, the power to shape the future of technology lies not just in the hands of a few developers but in all of us as active, informed users.
Dr Aneish Kumar has over 35 years experience in the global finance sector, including a significant 24-plus-year tenure as the MD & Country Manager at The Bank of New York, India, He holds a PhD in International Business.
About this section
Opinion pieces or "Op-Eds" are the home-made bombs of the publishing world. So long as they meet editorial standards, are not intentionally offensive with a view to causing hurt or insult and are relevant to our field of endeavour, we will look at submissions.
We like contentious, we like contrarian views. We don't like pretty much any -ism . We recognise that Opinion pieces are one person's view and are not balanced (if they are balanced and reach a reasoned conclusion, they are probably more suited to the Articles section). We do not like acronyms and buzzwords.
Op-Eds are the author's personal views and do not necessarily represent the views of World Money Laundering Report or its publishers.
To submit an Opinion piece, please complete the Contact form.

