
Shannon: Financial Crime Professionals lie for a living.

You don’t realise this when you first start the job.
At the beginning everything feels technical. Alerts come in. Transactions get reviewed. Something either makes sense or it doesn’t. If it doesn’t, you escalate it and the system moves forward.
Clean process. Clear decisions.
Then one day a client calls.
Nothing unusual about the call. They’ve spoken to the firm a hundred times before. The tone is relaxed. Friendly even. They’re asking why a transaction is delayed or why the account suddenly needs additional documents.
You already know the answer.
The file changed.
Somewhere in the last few days a note appeared in the system describing their behaviour very differently than it did before. The word itself might not be written yet. But everyone reviewing the account knows where the thinking is heading.
Suspicion.
From that moment the relationship becomes strange.
Joseph Shannon is head of legal and compliance and can be found on LinkedIn
The client is still speaking to you like the relationship hasn’t changed.
But it has.
You just can’t say it.
So you explain the delay the way everyone in AML eventually learns to explain things.
Routine review.
Operational checks.
Standard documentation refresh.
None of those statements are technically false. But they aren’t the truth either.
The truth is that somewhere inside the institution a file now exists that quietly describes the same client as potentially involved in criminal activity.
And they have no idea.
That’s the part of AML nobody really talks about.
The public imagines the job as technical work. Systems detecting patterns. Alerts identifying risk. Suspicious reports moving quietly to regulators.
What they don’t see is the moment the relationship changes while the conversation continues exactly the same.
The client still calls.
You still answer.
The tone stays polite. Professional. Normal.
But somewhere in the background the institution is slowly building a narrative about their behaviour that may eventually end up in the hands of law enforcement.
Both realities exist at the same time.
The client thinks the relationship is intact.
You know it has already broken.
And the strange thing about the job is that you have to keep talking to them like nothing has changed.
About this section
Opinion pieces or "Op-Eds" are the home-made bombs of the publishing world. So long as they meet editorial standards, are not intentionally offensive with a view to causing hurt or insult and are relevant to our field of endeavour, we will look at submissions.
We like contentious, we like contrarian views. We don't like pretty much any -ism . We recognise that Opinion pieces are one person's view and are not balanced (if they are balanced and reach a reasoned conclusion, they are probably more suited to the Articles section). We do not like acronyms and buzzwords.
Op-Eds are the author's personal views and do not necessarily represent the views of World Money Laundering Report or its publishers.
To submit an Opinion piece, please complete the Contact form.
